Post by sineG yuG lareneG on Jan 22, 2012 3:38:48 GMT -5
Ellipses. Spaces. 'nuff said.
We will be here to report in Earth's possible final hours...what...what was that sound outside?” The male news anchor asked.
I doubt a news anchor would say something like that on camera. Or at least, describe what he's doing. Such as him talking in a low voice to someone off screen, or him excusing himself. Gotta keep to their roles. They need more depth to 'em. Also take into the fact that the world is apparently ending. Would a news anchor sound so casual about it?
Suddenly gunshots, explosions, and screaming were heard
I think screams would fit better here. Considering screaming is an action while others described are plural things, blargg.
and a large group of armed people broke into the newsroom holding assault rifles, wearing masks.
Doesn't feel right, just saying that. Maybe you could write something like "the camera fell to the floor, and blurry images of armed men could be seen." Gotta take into account that it's being viewed from a camera.
“Please! Don't do thi--”
Again, gotta keep to character. I'd think a regular person would be confused and say something like "what's going on?!" and then them approaching menacingly before he starts pleading.
as the biggest shooter shot him directly in the face, causing blood to go everywhere, even onto the camera.
Couple things here. Shooter? There's a variety of words that would be better suited here. I feel that the sentence should end with the shot in face part, with the next sentence describing the aftermath. "Blood splattered everywhere, blotting out the camera."
"The female news anchor screamed to no avail, as one of them dragged her off-screen. The one who shot the male wiped the blood off of the camera, and took it over."
One of my many obsessions, but repetitiveness. Using "one" at this point feels too early. Also, saying "took it over" seems a bit unnecessary, or at least not warranting a comma before that. Something like "centering it onto his face" might be better.
Further onto that, the story progresses quite fast here. You could certainly do to extend it, like having commotion and inquiry go on before killing starts.
“This is a message, to all of you.
Comma be gone.
Maybe you've heard of me before from the news, the serial killer, the creator of chaos, blah blah blah...
Should be split into two sentences. Also, character. Maybe capitalize the titles. And would a serial killer really say "blah blah blah?" Maybe if he had a sort of bored disposition, but that doesn't feel right at all.
When he came back, he was holding the dismembered head of the male news anchor.
Feels like it needs more descriptions. Or at least adjectives. Like describe the look of horror on the face, or the dripping blood.
Now you're dead, and I'm holding your head and pointing it into your OWN GOD DAMNED CAMERA!
At this point the speech would be good to split up and mention what the character is doing. Like "the killer rose his voice and swung the head furiously, a demented look in his eyes." Maybe that's just me. It sounds like he's the kind of character that would make a bunch of motions to accompany his speech. Gestures can help reinforce their character and adds depth.
why anybody hasn't tried to shut down my message down yet
This sentence feels oddly constructed, perhaps move hasn't in front, but mostly needs a question mark, maybe start it as a new sentence.
I mean after all I kind of did just kill a guy on live TV
Would someone who really just commuted the act talk about it like that? He might add emphasis at the end of it, and use more commas.
Well, that's because my family has already went up and took care of that,
Sentence should end here. And went up sounds odd to me, but blargg.
I mean I don't think they'd really care when my family's busy shooting at them.
Opinion time, but I think you could go for more dramatic than "shooting at them." Maybe something like "busy sending them to the afterlife."
”
“
I'm pretty sure you don't need to end it if the person continues their speech on the next line. Maybe add a description of what's happening at this point, like final sounds of gunfire and suffering, or his expression.
“You could, you know, do what this ASSHOLE told you to do, or maybe you could just you know, let your inner human run wild.
Yeah, should be two sentences. But I feel a description of his expression would be great here too.
Most of you probably thought, oh, this is just another end of the world bull theory, but it's very real, and it will happen.
If he's doing quoting, you should go for text 'like this,' and add emphasis to his words like italicizing will.
The screen went to a technical difficulties screen,
Using screen a second time feels redundant.
and the people who were huddled around the TV watching all of it happened, looked at each other with curious gazes.
I think the and should be cut and it begins with a new sentence and describe it in past tensed.
While some still chose to stay with their families and friends like the news anchor had said, but
Either while or but should be cut.
No word was heard from other continents at all,
Heard doesn't feel right here. Maybe received.
Two hours, is not that much time, but humanity is an efficient species when it comes to killing itself. [/u]
I'd lose the first comma.
People broke into stores, brutally killed shopkeepers, and looted things that they didn't even need.
Okay, I'm not actually going to complain about this in particular (though I'd use a better word than killed and add emphasis to need), but give something closer to actual criticism than what I've done so far.
So, all this is originating from a single broadcast? Just one plain 'ol speech where for all the readers know, could have be an old guy speaking in a monotonic voice droning on? The speech earlier needs more depth than what it's actions imply. Describe the emotional aspects, body language, pitch, heck, even background.
And for that matter, you didn't even have the viewers said to react that much after the speech ended. For it to have caused stuff on this level, you should have had much greater reactions.
Weren't even going to be able to use,
Weren't going to use what? You need to add in that they weren't going to use stolen goods.
murdered other people.
I think others would sufficient.
Pretty quickly
I don't think quickly would be best here over something like soon.
blood, and the
I think another problem you may have is your usage of and. If you could make it into separate sentences to enhance the impact of it, then do so.
What would be capable of it?
This whole sentence feels out of place. Maybe it's just me.
explosions were caused.
Probably just me, but I think created would be better.
Society began to melt the fuck down, it was if Jack's message
Needs to be split up here.
desire of discord and chaos.
Basically saying "chaos" and "chaos" is a bit repetitive. Discord and destruction or something along those lines would be better.
The Government of the US, if it hadn't been scrambling in an attempt to evacuate so many people of it's own at once, would have been ashamed of the people in the nation, ashamed of itself for allowing such chaos and discord to happen so easily, all from that one damned message broadcasted across the nation.
See my previous thing for the chaos bit, and also split starting with ashamed of itself. Perhaps even make the message part it's own sentence.
Our story, is not about the fools that fell into Jack's chaotic thinking, no, not at all. A boy, and his father,
Too many commas here.
It will continue, and it will continue, long after we are gone.
The second comma makes it sound really redundant.
Guess I'll actually criticize more about the plot tomorrow rather than just say minor annoyances here and there with only one or two of them actually having good advice.
We will be here to report in Earth's possible final hours...what...what was that sound outside?” The male news anchor asked.
I doubt a news anchor would say something like that on camera. Or at least, describe what he's doing. Such as him talking in a low voice to someone off screen, or him excusing himself. Gotta keep to their roles. They need more depth to 'em. Also take into the fact that the world is apparently ending. Would a news anchor sound so casual about it?
Suddenly gunshots, explosions, and screaming were heard
I think screams would fit better here. Considering screaming is an action while others described are plural things, blargg.
and a large group of armed people broke into the newsroom holding assault rifles, wearing masks.
Doesn't feel right, just saying that. Maybe you could write something like "the camera fell to the floor, and blurry images of armed men could be seen." Gotta take into account that it's being viewed from a camera.
“Please! Don't do thi--”
Again, gotta keep to character. I'd think a regular person would be confused and say something like "what's going on?!" and then them approaching menacingly before he starts pleading.
as the biggest shooter shot him directly in the face, causing blood to go everywhere, even onto the camera.
Couple things here. Shooter? There's a variety of words that would be better suited here. I feel that the sentence should end with the shot in face part, with the next sentence describing the aftermath. "Blood splattered everywhere, blotting out the camera."
"The female news anchor screamed to no avail, as one of them dragged her off-screen. The one who shot the male wiped the blood off of the camera, and took it over."
One of my many obsessions, but repetitiveness. Using "one" at this point feels too early. Also, saying "took it over" seems a bit unnecessary, or at least not warranting a comma before that. Something like "centering it onto his face" might be better.
Further onto that, the story progresses quite fast here. You could certainly do to extend it, like having commotion and inquiry go on before killing starts.
“This is a message, to all of you.
Comma be gone.
Maybe you've heard of me before from the news, the serial killer, the creator of chaos, blah blah blah...
Should be split into two sentences. Also, character. Maybe capitalize the titles. And would a serial killer really say "blah blah blah?" Maybe if he had a sort of bored disposition, but that doesn't feel right at all.
When he came back, he was holding the dismembered head of the male news anchor.
Feels like it needs more descriptions. Or at least adjectives. Like describe the look of horror on the face, or the dripping blood.
Now you're dead, and I'm holding your head and pointing it into your OWN GOD DAMNED CAMERA!
At this point the speech would be good to split up and mention what the character is doing. Like "the killer rose his voice and swung the head furiously, a demented look in his eyes." Maybe that's just me. It sounds like he's the kind of character that would make a bunch of motions to accompany his speech. Gestures can help reinforce their character and adds depth.
why anybody hasn't tried to shut down my message down yet
This sentence feels oddly constructed, perhaps move hasn't in front, but mostly needs a question mark, maybe start it as a new sentence.
I mean after all I kind of did just kill a guy on live TV
Would someone who really just commuted the act talk about it like that? He might add emphasis at the end of it, and use more commas.
Well, that's because my family has already went up and took care of that,
Sentence should end here. And went up sounds odd to me, but blargg.
I mean I don't think they'd really care when my family's busy shooting at them.
Opinion time, but I think you could go for more dramatic than "shooting at them." Maybe something like "busy sending them to the afterlife."
”
“
I'm pretty sure you don't need to end it if the person continues their speech on the next line. Maybe add a description of what's happening at this point, like final sounds of gunfire and suffering, or his expression.
“You could, you know, do what this ASSHOLE told you to do, or maybe you could just you know, let your inner human run wild.
Yeah, should be two sentences. But I feel a description of his expression would be great here too.
Most of you probably thought, oh, this is just another end of the world bull theory, but it's very real, and it will happen.
If he's doing quoting, you should go for text 'like this,' and add emphasis to his words like italicizing will.
The screen went to a technical difficulties screen,
Using screen a second time feels redundant.
and the people who were huddled around the TV watching all of it happened, looked at each other with curious gazes.
I think the and should be cut and it begins with a new sentence and describe it in past tensed.
While some still chose to stay with their families and friends like the news anchor had said, but
Either while or but should be cut.
No word was heard from other continents at all,
Heard doesn't feel right here. Maybe received.
Two hours, is not that much time, but humanity is an efficient species when it comes to killing itself. [/u]
I'd lose the first comma.
People broke into stores, brutally killed shopkeepers, and looted things that they didn't even need.
Okay, I'm not actually going to complain about this in particular (though I'd use a better word than killed and add emphasis to need), but give something closer to actual criticism than what I've done so far.
So, all this is originating from a single broadcast? Just one plain 'ol speech where for all the readers know, could have be an old guy speaking in a monotonic voice droning on? The speech earlier needs more depth than what it's actions imply. Describe the emotional aspects, body language, pitch, heck, even background.
And for that matter, you didn't even have the viewers said to react that much after the speech ended. For it to have caused stuff on this level, you should have had much greater reactions.
Weren't even going to be able to use,
Weren't going to use what? You need to add in that they weren't going to use stolen goods.
murdered other people.
I think others would sufficient.
Pretty quickly
I don't think quickly would be best here over something like soon.
blood, and the
I think another problem you may have is your usage of and. If you could make it into separate sentences to enhance the impact of it, then do so.
What would be capable of it?
This whole sentence feels out of place. Maybe it's just me.
explosions were caused.
Probably just me, but I think created would be better.
Society began to melt the fuck down, it was if Jack's message
Needs to be split up here.
desire of discord and chaos.
Basically saying "chaos" and "chaos" is a bit repetitive. Discord and destruction or something along those lines would be better.
The Government of the US, if it hadn't been scrambling in an attempt to evacuate so many people of it's own at once, would have been ashamed of the people in the nation, ashamed of itself for allowing such chaos and discord to happen so easily, all from that one damned message broadcasted across the nation.
See my previous thing for the chaos bit, and also split starting with ashamed of itself. Perhaps even make the message part it's own sentence.
Our story, is not about the fools that fell into Jack's chaotic thinking, no, not at all. A boy, and his father,
Too many commas here.
It will continue, and it will continue, long after we are gone.
The second comma makes it sound really redundant.
Guess I'll actually criticize more about the plot tomorrow rather than just say minor annoyances here and there with only one or two of them actually having good advice.